<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Now that&#8217;s more like it!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nsidestrate.com/blog/2008/04/16/now-thats-more-like-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nsidestrate.com/blog/2008/04/16/now-thats-more-like-it/</link>
	<description>Dedicated the successful management of our world's fisheries/cardrooms.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 23:34:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nsidestrate</title>
		<link>http://www.nsidestrate.com/blog/2008/04/16/now-thats-more-like-it/comment-page-1/#comment-109836</link>
		<dc:creator>Nsidestrate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsidestrate.com/blog/?p=224#comment-109836</guid>
		<description>The 22 hand is an interesting river decision.  The problem is that an overset is going to 3 bet your raise every time.  So you are risking 2 bets to win 1.  You need to be against a worse hand 34% of the time to profitably make the river raise.  Given the action, I don&#039;t think you will see KK or JJ ever.  I think you are looking at AA/QQ/TT pretty much every time.  I&#039;m never giving that much action with AA in that spot, nor would any of the better players at this level.  Even the more LAGtastic players would usually check-call the river with AA there.  If it was a regular, I would conclude that he really thought I was a donkey because he would have to think I&#039;m giving that much action with KK there.

This hand is also proof of the merits of my approach to playing sets fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 22 hand is an interesting river decision.  The problem is that an overset is going to 3 bet your raise every time.  So you are risking 2 bets to win 1.  You need to be against a worse hand 34% of the time to profitably make the river raise.  Given the action, I don&#8217;t think you will see KK or JJ ever.  I think you are looking at AA/QQ/TT pretty much every time.  I&#8217;m never giving that much action with AA in that spot, nor would any of the better players at this level.  Even the more LAGtastic players would usually check-call the river with AA there.  If it was a regular, I would conclude that he really thought I was a donkey because he would have to think I&#8217;m giving that much action with KK there.</p>
<p>This hand is also proof of the merits of my approach to playing sets fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toro</title>
		<link>http://www.nsidestrate.com/blog/2008/04/16/now-thats-more-like-it/comment-page-1/#comment-109830</link>
		<dc:creator>Toro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsidestrate.com/blog/?p=224#comment-109830</guid>
		<description>I totally know what ur talking about when you say &#039;in the zone&#039; a lot of times people ask me how I play something and I&#039;ll answer &quot;depends on my mood&quot; and they think I&#039;m  BSing them.

In the 22 hand I&#039;ll usually raise/call on the river, but the board being that dry a call probably is just as good with a ton less variance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally know what ur talking about when you say &#8216;in the zone&#8217; a lot of times people ask me how I play something and I&#8217;ll answer &#8220;depends on my mood&#8221; and they think I&#8217;m  BSing them.</p>
<p>In the 22 hand I&#8217;ll usually raise/call on the river, but the board being that dry a call probably is just as good with a ton less variance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

