<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: April wrap-up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nsidestrate.com/blog/2008/05/01/april-wrap-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nsidestrate.com/blog/2008/05/01/april-wrap-up/</link>
	<description>Dedicated the successful management of our world's fisheries/cardrooms.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nsidestrate</title>
		<link>http://www.nsidestrate.com/blog/2008/05/01/april-wrap-up/comment-page-1/#comment-111522</link>
		<dc:creator>Nsidestrate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 15:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsidestrate.com/blog/?p=234#comment-111522</guid>
		<description>I'm actually not one who usually believes in 100k downswings either.  I think the only way for it to happen would be if you were a very slight winner with a relatively high SD.  Then it is fairly easy.  For instance if you win 1 bb/100 and have a SD of only 14 bb/100, a downswing over 65,000 hands would be within 2 standard deviations.  As your expected earn rate increases, the likelihood of this kind of downswing reduces significantly.  I also suspect that the guy whose average win rate is 1 bb/100 actually plays much worse than that sometimes.  

Having said that, I know some players who I know to be very good long term winners who have had some soul-crushing downswings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually not one who usually believes in 100k downswings either.  I think the only way for it to happen would be if you were a very slight winner with a relatively high SD.  Then it is fairly easy.  For instance if you win 1 bb/100 and have a SD of only 14 bb/100, a downswing over 65,000 hands would be within 2 standard deviations.  As your expected earn rate increases, the likelihood of this kind of downswing reduces significantly.  I also suspect that the guy whose average win rate is 1 bb/100 actually plays much worse than that sometimes.  </p>
<p>Having said that, I know some players who I know to be very good long term winners who have had some soul-crushing downswings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pud's Poker</title>
		<link>http://www.nsidestrate.com/blog/2008/05/01/april-wrap-up/comment-page-1/#comment-111492</link>
		<dc:creator>Pud's Poker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 08:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nsidestrate.com/blog/?p=234#comment-111492</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure if a someone could go on a 100k hand downswing which was totally down to variance but I have heard of 50-100k break even spells which must be very hard to take.

As for short-term variance, I played in a short handed ting game the other day and 1st hand I was dealt AA and ended up AIPF against KK and it held for once! Two hands later everyone left the table so in 3 hands I'd made 100BB!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if a someone could go on a 100k hand downswing which was totally down to variance but I have heard of 50-100k break even spells which must be very hard to take.</p>
<p>As for short-term variance, I played in a short handed ting game the other day and 1st hand I was dealt AA and ended up AIPF against KK and it held for once! Two hands later everyone left the table so in 3 hands I&#8217;d made 100BB!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
